tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705820500334920463.post6418079665519376637..comments2023-06-24T03:29:48.721-05:00Comments on Ms. Conduct: Surprise IceMs. Conducthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06998363658537935772noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705820500334920463.post-91385480234433726672011-04-01T12:38:46.368-05:002011-04-01T12:38:46.368-05:00@Nick in CO....
I ask the zebras how they are doi...@Nick in CO....<br /><br />I ask the zebras how they are doing and wish them a good game and always hand them the biscuit after I freeze it.<br /><br />Except when one or both are having a less than stellar evening.<br /><br />In that case, they can bend over and pick it up themselves.klemmerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11364333649246745295noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705820500334920463.post-52389130605740113442011-04-01T09:39:58.113-05:002011-04-01T09:39:58.113-05:00I agree with Nick in New York (I should call mysel...I agree with Nick in New York (I should call myself Nick in Colorado!), goal or no goal players now know that all they have to do with this ref is complain an there's an outside chance he'll reverse his call ... LAME. He's totally botched his rep for a good while.<br /><br />That's too funny about pulling the puck out for the ref, I've totally done that. I had my d-man in the corner getting ready to break out and one of our opponents was closing in. My d-man spun around to get away and turned into the ref, only the ref made no attempt to get out of the way (see where this going?). Next thing I know the opposing forward has the puck and scores on me. As the ref came to get the puck, I pushed it back into the net. He was livid, but I think I was more so!Nickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03928044224401382019noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705820500334920463.post-90725436779353302232011-03-30T13:41:20.446-05:002011-03-30T13:41:20.446-05:00Ha, yeah, I'm not nearly clever enough to thin...Ha, yeah, I'm not nearly clever enough to think to dislodge my goal on purpose. I honestly had to look twice to even see that it WAS dislodged. It was back MAX 3" from its correct location. Not a big deal but off is off, right?<br /><br />Funny, after the goal, the puck was way back in the back of the net and I waited until he waved the goal off to pull it out for him. I was gonna make him get it himself if he called it a goal. So he waves it off, I pull it out for him, he goes out to face the music from the other team, and then changes his mind. Shoulda left the damn thing in the net.<br /><br />And yeah, if the play hadn't been so fast and furious at that moment, I'm sure he would have had time to acknowledge my d-man's yelling and just push it into place, but there was just too much going on. He probably didn't even have time to look, and you really did have to look to see it.Ms. Conducthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06998363658537935772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705820500334920463.post-60252565272299613542011-03-30T13:40:19.152-05:002011-03-30T13:40:19.152-05:00In reviewing the rule, officials are granted leewa...In reviewing the rule, officials are granted leeway in regards to intent.<br /><br />If they feel that a defensive player intentionally displaced the net, a goal can be awarded if the puck would have entered the net if it was in place.<br /><br />If they feel there is no intent, the play should be blown dead upon noticing that the goal is displaced.<br /><br /> A minor penalty shall be imposed on any player (including a<br />goalkeeper) who delays the game by deliberately displacing a<br />goal post from its normal position. The Referee or Linesmen<br />shall stop play immediately when a goal post has been<br />displaced.<br />If the defending team has deliberately displaced the goal<br />post, thereby depriving the attacking team of an immediate<br />and reasonable scoring opportunity, or if, during the course of<br />a break-away, the goalkeeper (all classifications) or player<br />(excluding Adults) deliberately removes his helmet/facemask,<br />a penalty shot/optional minor penalty shall be awarded to<br />the non-offending team, which shot shall be taken by the<br />player last in possession of the puck.<br />If a player of the defending team deliberately displaces the<br />goal and, in the opinion of the Referee, the puck would have<br />entered the goal had it not been displaced, or if the defending<br />team deliberately displaces the goal when the goalkeeper is<br />off the ice, thereby preventing an obvious and imminent<br />goal, a goal shall be awarded in lieu of a penalty shot.klemmerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11364333649246745295noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705820500334920463.post-90060961595668517132011-03-30T13:30:31.156-05:002011-03-30T13:30:31.156-05:00How weird- I had the post thing happen to me Mon a...How weird- I had the post thing happen to me Mon as well. <br /><br />Score is 2-0, good guys. I give one up on a busted play and about a minute later, knock the net off while scrambling to regain my crease. Puck goes in and goal is (properly) disallowed. If the goal is dislodged "when the puck goes in", the correct call is no goal.<br /><br />Many times, I have had a zebra push the net back into place if it's off by a couple of inches, and play carries on.<br /><br />Screams go up that I should be given a DOG for knocking it off intentionally, and zebra says "He knows how to knock it off the right way if he wants, no goal" <br /><br />We win 2-1, despite being shorthanded for the last 1:47 of the game.<br /><br />Now, for the question. No matter what, GOALIES PLAY TO THE WHISTLE.<br /><br />That said, it WAS a BS move by the Zeb to change his mind to what was the incorrect call. He'd be picking up pucks that I froze all night long for that one.klemmerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11364333649246745295noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705820500334920463.post-55529167790150327872011-03-30T12:59:18.704-05:002011-03-30T12:59:18.704-05:00That's a pretty ugly sitch with the call/rever...That's a pretty ugly sitch with the call/reverse call. Either way, the ref's got to have more conviction, I'd say. <br /><br />"My D screaming about it while the play was going on and my letting up as a result was a 95% of the reason the puck went in."<br /><br />if the wrap around was to the side that had been pushed behind the goal line, then the goalie part of me says, though, that the other 5% was because the net WAS off, though.<br /><br />But, I would like to know about the rule. Does the fact of the net being off in and of itself render the play (and goal) dead? I would guess that it doesn't matter until/unless the ref blows the whistle. But I don't know. Hopefully someone else does.Nick in New Yorkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10630427380350968877noreply@blogger.com